Tapaus Tellus
Multicultural evening

Irmeli Luoma
Humanities Polytechnic
The Korpilahti Unit, Finland

Abstract
Fifteen students at the Korpilahti Unit of Humanities Polytechnic in central Finland cooperated in several ways with people of different ethnic backgrounds living in Jyväskylä. The cooperation took place through several types of activities: studies, workshops and the final cultural production, a multicultural evening, planned and organised together by all participants. The nationalities of the immigrants who participated in the project were Kurdish, Iranian and Russian. The themes of the course and cultural evening were dance and music.

The multicultural evening was preceded by theoretical studies of music, dance, cultural differences and intercultural communication. This project was one of a series of three intercultural projects realized at the Korpilahti Unit of Humanities Polytechnic in Finland within the EU Socrates / Grundtvig project ”Enhancing Cultural Awareness through Cultural Production”.

The lectures, workshops and the final cultural production were all successful and the students and immigrants alike were committed to the project. The project offered concrete opportunities to increase and widen contacts between people from different ethnic groups, including Finns. In addition all participants learnt about each other’s cultures. Furthermore the participants’ awareness of and interest in cultural diversity was increased during the project.

Aims
The project aimed at offering concrete opportunities to increase and widen contacts and cooperation between ethnic minority groups in the Jyväskylä region and Finnish Humanities Polytechnic students at the Korpilahti Unit.

Secondly, the project was aimed at increasing knowledge of cultural differences in general and that of the three minority cultures in particular. Alongside of this it aimed at arousing people’s interest in other cultures. Finnish people and people from ethnic minority groups learnt about each other's cultures and thus increased tolerance and mutual understanding, reducing racism and hostility.

Futhermore, the project provided Finnish students and foreigners with a common learning environment where they developed a common cultural production, which was presented to a wider audience, consisting of people from the local community and nearby region. The aim was to attract an audience of about 200 people.

Through cooperation, cultural similarities and differences, learnt and encountered in practice during the process, both foreigners and Finns learnt about their own cultures and themselves. A part of this was the process of becoming more aware of one's own prejudices and racist attitudes. Throughout the process students developed their cooperative skills with people of different ethnic backgrounds, and so became more tolerant, flexible and culturally more sensitive.

Effective use of the media meant that people in the region were informed about the study programme and the final production. Immigrants, refugees and their cultures deserve positive attention and increased interest among the main stream culture. Immigrants deserve to be seen in a positive light in the media, because they are far too often marginalized by the media.

Contents
The course commenced in October and lasted until mid-November 2000. The activities carried out during the study period included theoretical studies, workshops, an excursion and a final cultural production in the form of a multicultural evening. The themes studied during the course and used in the multicultural evening were dance and music.

The partners, organisations and contacts included:

• Students of the cultural production and management degree programme at the Korpilahti Unit of Humanities Polytechnic.
• the Foreign Office of the city of Jyväskylä
• Paletti – projekti (a temporary regional project working on the acculturation of refugees and immigrants, financed by the city of Jyväskylä)
• Taivaankaari ry, (an organization working for the integration of refugees and immigrants, financed by Jyväskylä)
• Club Siperia (a temporary project to integrate young people from minority groups and of the mainstream Finnish background financed by the municipality)
• several associations of Kurdish, Iranian and Russian refugees and immigrants in the region
• a number of experts on dance and music
• students of Multicultural Studies at the local college Alkio-opisto
• students of a local Community College

Fifteen students participated in the project, in addition to a total of sixty Kurds, Iranians and Russians. The multicultural event “Tapaus Tellus”gathered an audience of about 150.

The beginning of the project
The preparation for the project started in the beginning of August 2000. The first task was to create a network including Humanities Polytechnic, several organizations and individuals. We contacted the Foreign Office of the city of Jyväskylä and were able to involve them in the project. The students acquainted themselves with the work of the Foreign Office in Jyväskylä and with their help we were able to contact members of Kurdish, Iranian and Russian refugee and immigrant associations. It was vital to find key persons within these communities, who were interested in participating and were able to activate members of their ethnic communities.

Cooperation was planned by representatives of Humanities Polytechnic and the Foreign Office of Jyväskylä together with Kurds, Iranians and Russians. One of the ideas in our project was to bring together people from different age groups, not only students in their 20s.

Methods

Practice-oriented studies were combined with theoretical studies of cultural differences and intercultural communication. These offered a range of views and perspectives on the reality of everyday life for ethnic minorities in the Jyväskylä region. In addition, students became familiar with acculturation projects organized by the municipal authorities in the region.

Frequent interaction was attained by visits, discussions, interviews, lectures and workshops which provided an insight into the integration process of immigrants and refugees in central Finland. In addition students interviewed immigrants and refugees to learn about their life stories.

Final production
The multicultural evening was preceeded by a number of occasions where Finnish people and foreigners met and interacted, to plan and develop the evening. People of different ages and ethnic backgrounds were thus brought together.

Kurds, Iranians and Russians together with the students organised a multicultural evening, which was open to the public. The media, the local and provincial papers, and radio were used to inform people about the event.

Curriculum
The themes of the final production were dance and music and it was realized together with Kurds, Iranians and Russians.

The curriculum consisted of the following modules, part of which were running in parallel:

• Studies of the philosophy and theory of dance, its connections and linkage to social and cultural changes in society. These included lectures and workshops on the history and styles of Finnish, Kurdish, Persian and Arabic traditional dance. Theoretical studies were combined with workshops concentrating on the final event, the multicultural evening “Tapaus Tellus”.
• Theoretical studies of the history, styles and cultural contexts of traditional Kurdish music, poetry and dance. These lectures were combined with workshops concentrating on the development of the multicultural event.
• Visits to The International Kuopio Dance Festival and Dance Theatre Minimi in Kuopio to become familiar with their work, programmes and cooperation with different cultures.
• Theories of cultural differences, intercultural communication, otherness and racism.
• A range of views and perspectives on the reality of everyday life for ethnic minorities in the Jyväskylä region were presented.
  Kurds, Iranians and Russians were invited to talk about their cultures and adaptation to Finnish culture. Municipal authorities and officers working on the acculturation process of refugees and immigrants was alsopresented their views. In addition, some foreigners were interviewed by students. Their personal life stories helped students understand the interviewees’ background and the reasons behind their immigration to Finland.
• Planning, preparing and realizing a multicultural evening, together with refugees and immigrants. The event was open to the public and people in the region were effectively informed about the event.

It was our deliberate pedagogical and didactic aim to study and work on a broad basis. To achieve this the lectures and workshops included not only theory but also a more practical acquaintance and contact with the cultures of the ethnic groups involved. This approach enabled us to involve the different minority groups throughout the project.

Best practice
With the help of the Foreign Office of Jyväskylä we were able to be in contact and cooperate with three nationalities Kurds, Iranians and Russians. The local college Alkio-opisto had had some experience in cooperating with a small group of young Kurds within the Multicultural Studies programme during the spring term 2000. We were able to benefit from these contacts and succeeded in increasing contacts with Kurds on a wider basis. There were several families, from grandparents to young children and babies, who participated in our workhops. Likewise Iranians were involved in our project and they were committed to working with us.

The only group we had some difficulties to get involved in the project were Russians. There were probably several reasons for this. Russians do not live in such a close community as Kurds and Iranians. The Russian contact person in the Paletti Project said she found it quite hard to motivate Russians. According to her it was difficult to create a network among Russians. All in all, Russians did not seem to be as keen on working in the project as the other two ethnic minority groups.

There was a specific course intergrated into the project concentrating on cultural differences, racism and otherness. This helped students to perceive and become more conscious of cultural differences and provided tools to come to terms with these differences. In addition students read newspaper articles on refugees and immigrants in Finland. This aroused a lot of discussion.

Feedback
Quotations from students’ comments on the project and its effects taken from the questionnaire:

“All the work in the project has effected me positively.”
“ All our projects have widened my mind a lot; when I walk in the street my attitude towards foreigners is different compared with what it used to be.”
“My interest towards other cultures has increased.”
“I was delighted to work with foreigners of different ages, what I liked best was working with children.”
“ My attitudes towards foreigners have become more positive and I do not consider them as strange and different as before.”
“Cooperation with foreigners has dispersed my prejudices.”
“My prejudices have decreased, but I cannot say that they have totally disappeared.”
“I have realized what a huge change it is to settle down in a new culture. Problems due to that should be solved together instead of only accusing immigrants.”
“I have in a discussion with Finns defended immigrants and explained their problems and told about their culture.”
“I would like to make friends with persons of a different ethnic background.”
“Encountering foreigners, especially Kurds, has increased my interest and enthusiasm to work with them and other foreigners.”
“I have learnt to understand foreigners better, I have realized that their life is not easy in Finland.”
“Knowledge of other cultures increases tolerance, it helps to meet the other one halfway.”
“It does not matter, although at first it is hard to encounter a stranger.”
“Personal life stories were most striking, they have helped me to open up towards foreigners.”
“I feel I have got a lot of courage to be in contact with representatives of other cultures.”
“ I have learnt new things about myself as a result of this multicultural project. I perceive my feelings and attitudes more sensitively than before and the understanding and tolerance of otherness has become easier for me.”
“I am a bit better prepared for delays caused by cultural differences.”
“I have gained courage and I feel more confident with foreigners.”
“I understand now that problems and misunderstandings are normal and that no one can avoid them.”
“We should talk to each other like a human to another human, not like a Finn to a foreigner; humanity is our common language.”
“Humanity is uncovered in cooperation.”
“Disgreements should not be taken personally, because they may be caused by cultural differences and not by personal hatreds.”
“My world view has widened.”
“My prejudices have decreased.”
“ I have found new areas in myself, the project has aroused new feelings and thoughts.”
“I have noticed how proud Kurds are of their culture.”
“It is important to know about foreigners’ personal background to be able to develop cooperation with them.”
“I hope that we continue concrete cooperation with refugees and immigrants.”
“Practice-oriented studies are the best means to learn about other cultures.”
“The dance workshop with young Kurds united us, I had a feeling that we were all young people and alike.”
“ I was impressed by the openness, joyfulness, friendliness and spontaneity of young Kurds.”

The students filled in a questionnaire on the effects the project had on their personal professional development and expertise.

Theoretical studies of dance and music, cultural differences, intercultural communication and features of the three specific cultures were followed by workshops during which the multicultural evening “Tapaus Tellus”was prepared.

The media was effectively used to inform local people about the project in its different phases. Press releases were sent to the provincial newspaper and local papers that cover the region. Posters and flyers were used to give information about the event. Unfortunately the project was unable to attract either radio or television to the event.

The multicultural evening “Tapaus Tellus” was organised on the 8th of November 2000 attracting about 150 people, most of whom were students of Humanities Polytechnic and Alkio College , but people from the local community and the city of Jyväskylä were also present.

All the four languages Iranian, Kurdish, Russian and Finnish were used in the announcements and throughout the evening.

The programme included:

• traditional Finnish folk music
• Arabic, Kurdish and Finnish folk dances
• classical Russian dances
• traditional Finnish folk dances
• comic sketches
• parodies of Little Red Riding Hood and Sleeping Beauty
• Arabic prose performed by Aziz Sheikhani, accompanied by Rashid Fayesnejad (violin)
• Baran Barana, a Kurdish song, sung by Finnish students and accompanied by Rashid Fayeznejad
• teacher and poet Kiamars Baghbani recited his own poems,
• interpreted into Finnish by Sari Siimes, a Humanities Polytechnic student
• performance of a visiting group of Ecuadorian muscians, who participated in the multicultural week arranged by students at Alkio College
• group dance of a Finnish polka, in which the performers and the audience participated

One of the highlights of the evening was the presentation given by a group of Finnish students, who sang a Kurdish song accompanied by Mr Rashid Fayeznejad, a Kurdish musician and dancer who taught in one of the workshops. The students were responsible for all the practical arrangements of the evening.

Evaluation

Achievements, side-effects and discoveries
The aims set for the project were reached quite well. Considering the extremely tight schedule, due to the set form of module studies at Humanities Polytechnic, the project succeeded well. Reasons for this may be found in the following:

• the structure of the project: Studies of cultural differences and intercultural communication, contacts with foreigners, workshops and preparation of the final event.
• refugees and immigrants being involved in the project from the beginning including the planning of the project (steering group)
• the creation of the network was started sufficiently early, in August 2000, and it was successful
• the parties involved were committed to the project
• the students were motivated

Questionnaires and oral feedback showed that all the partners benefit culturally from the project. In addition the Humanities Polytechnic students gained professional experience through the planning and organisation of a multicultural event.

Providing the broad basis of theoretical studies and contacts with foreigners before workshops proved to be a very good decision. When starting with workshops, students and immigrants were better prepared and culturally much more sensitive, rather than if they had started with the workshops straight away without a longer “preparation”. It was seen as important to establish a relationship between the students and immigrants before starting the workshops.

The project has also had side-effects. It led to intensified cooperation with refugees and immigrants in the Jyväskylä area. A group of students of the local college familiarized with a multicultural daycare centre in Jyväskylä and later did a one-day training themselves there. Another group helped a group of young Russians in their 20s to learn more about Finnish culture. An outdoor winter event organized at the college attracted about 20 refugees, mainly families.

One example of the long-term effects of the project is that a Humanities Polytechnic student is doing her work placement in the Writers’ House in Jyväskylä, which is involved in multicultural issues. The student is among other things running a workshop on the Finnish national epic the Kalevala for an ethnic minority group.

Difficulties
We encountered three kinds of difficulties in our project related to tensions between some ethnic minority groups, financial matters and the students’ team-working skills. We encountered some difficulties with ethnic minority groups during the project due to their internal groupings and tensions. Certain groups refused to work together. This meant that the participation of one group in the project caused an automatic exclusion of another. It took us some time to realize this. At times we were accused of favouring cooperation with certain groups.

Also the participation of a certain ethnic group in our multicultural evening “Tapaus Tellus” was critical. Even on the day of the event it seemed that one ethnic group would not participate at all. They only came on the condition that another group did not attend.

We also had some disagreements about financial matters with our ethnic minority partners. In projects of this kind every single detail should be confirmed in a written document, otherwise a claim of increased financial support is presented.

The Humanities Polytechnic students had many problems to get started with the project. One reason for this was their insufficient team-working skills. They had only had half a year’s experience of studying and working together before the project begun. In the initial phases of team-work they were, according to their own judgements, overcritical and intolerant towards suggestions made by their fellow students. In the course of the project the students merged to form a group, which displayed a great deal of inventiveness, energy and expertise.

Services

Irmeli Luoma
Coordinator
irmeli.luoma@alkio.fi
Tel. +358 14 8201213 or 213465